Skip to navigation bar Skip to breadcrumbs Skip to page content Skip to comments area
clear place holder
Envelope icon E-mail Updates Teal square Text size:  a A A
You are here: HomePublic Comments and NominationsOpportunity for Public CommentDraft Research Plan : Draft Research Plan

Draft Research Plan

Draft Research Plan for Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Pregnant Women: Screening

This opportunity for public comment expired on August 9, 2017 at 8:00 PM EST

Note: This is a Draft Research Plan. This draft is distributed solely for the purpose of receiving public input. It has not been disseminated otherwise by the USPSTF. The final Research Plan will be used to guide a systematic review of the evidence by researchers at an Evidence-based Practice Center. The resulting Evidence Review will form the basis of the USPSTF Recommendation Statement on this topic.

Recommendations made by the USPSTF are independent of the U.S. government. They should not be construed as an official position of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Send Us Your Comments

In an effort to maintain a high level of transparency in our methods, we open our draft Research Plans to a public comment period before we publish the final version.

Comment period is not open at this time.

Draft: Proposed Analytic Framework

 

Figure 1 is the analytic framework that depicts the four Key Questions to be addressed in the systematic review. The figure illustrates how universal screening during pregnancy may result in improved health outcomes, including a reduction in the vertical transmission rates of hepatitis B as well as decreased morbidity and mortality (KQ1). The figure also depicts how programs to prevent the vertical transmission of hepatitis B may result in improved health outcomes, including a reduction in the vertical transmission rates of hepatitis B as well as decreased morbidity and mortality (KQ3). Further, the figure illustrates whether universal screening during pregnancy and programs to prevent the vertical transmission of hepatitis B infection are associated with any adverse events (KQ2, KQ4).

 

Text Description

Figure 1 is the analytic framework that depicts the four Key Questions to be addressed in the systematic review. The figure illustrates how universal screening during pregnancy may result in improved health outcomes, including a reduction in the vertical transmission rates of hepatitis B as well as decreased morbidity and mortality (KQ1). The figure also depicts how programs to prevent the vertical transmission of hepatitis B may result in improved health outcomes, including a reduction in the vertical transmission rates of hepatitis B as well as decreased morbidity and mortality (KQ3). Further, the figure illustrates whether universal screening during pregnancy and programs to prevent the vertical transmission of hepatitis B infection are associated with any adverse events (KQ2, KQ4).

Draft: Proposed Key Questions to Be Systematically Reviewed

  1. What are the population benefits of universal screening programs for hepatitis B virus infection in pregnant women?
  2. What are the harms of universal screening programs for hepatitis B virus infection in pregnant women?
  3. What is the effectiveness of case management programs to prevent vertical transmission among pregnant women who have hepatitis B virus infection?
  4. What are the harms of case management programs to prevent vertical transmission among pregnant women who have hepatitis B virus infection?

Draft: Proposed Contextual Questions

Contextual questions will not be systematically reviewed and are not shown in the Analytic Framework.

  1. Do any subgroups of pregnant women benefit from repeat screening in the third trimester based on the presence of specific risk factors?
  2. What is the effectiveness of vaccination for the hepatitis B virus, immunoglobulin therapy, and antiviral treatment for preventing vertical transmission among pregnant women?

Draft: Proposed Research Approach

The Proposed Research Approach identifies the study characteristics and criteria that the Evidence-based Practice Center will use to search for publications and to determine whether identified studies should be included or excluded from the Evidence Review. Criteria are overarching as well as specific to each of the key questions (KQs).

  Included Excluded
Aim To evaluate the effects of prenatal screening for hepatitis B virus infection on health outcomes and transmission rates and the effects of management and treatment programs among pregnant women with hepatitis B virus infection

 

Populations KQs 1, 2: Pregnant women at any gestation who are not known to have hepatitis B virus infection
KQs 3, 4: Pregnant women with hepatitis B virus infection
KQs 1, 2: Pregnant women who are known to have hepatitis B virus infection; women who are not pregnant; male partners of pregnant women
Interventions KQs 1, 2: Universal screening for hepatitis B surface antigen
KQs 3, 4: Organized programs aimed at preventing vertical transmission of hepatitis B virus infection among pregnant women; management and followup programs that deliver effective/recommended prophylactic interventions for women and neonates to reduce vertical transmission of hepatitis B virus infection
KQs 1, 2: Viral load followup testing among screen-positive women
Comparisons KQs 1, 2: No screening; targeted screening
KQs 3, 4: Before-after comparisons of vertical transmission of hepatitis B virus infection associated with program implementation across time, geographic sites, or populations, both with and without case management for followup and immunotherapy

 

Outcomes KQs 1, 3: Mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B virus infection; infant morbidity and mortality from perinatal hepatitis B virus infection
KQ 2: Harms from the screening test or receipt of test results
KQ 4: Harms from management of screen-detected hepatitis B virus infection; negative effects on maternal and infant health
KQ 1: Diagnostic accuracy
KQ 3: Effects of individual interventions for hepatitis B virus infection (e.g., antiviral treatment) administered outside of a care program
KQ 4: Harms of specific pharmacologic interventions
Setting Any health care setting or level of care Settings where universal vaccination of newborns for hepatitis B virus infection is not recommended or practiced
Country Studies conducted in countries categorized as “high” to “very high” on the Human Development Index (as defined by the United Nations Development Programme) Studies conducted in countries not categorized as "high" or "very high" on the Human Development Index
Study Design KQ 1: Randomized or clinical controlled trials, systematic reviews, before-after and ecologic studies with a historical or geographic comparator
KQs 2–4: All of the above plus cohort studies, case series, and registry data
KQs 3, 4: Trials examining the effectiveness of individual pharmacologic treatments to prevent vertical transmission of hepatitis B virus infection administered outside of a care management program
Language English-language only Languages other than English
Study Quality Fair- or good-quality studies Poor-quality studies
Publication Dates 1986 to the present Studies conducted prior to the introduction of vaccination for hepatitis B virus infection

 

Current as of: July 2017

Internet Citation: Draft Research Plan: Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Pregnant Women: Screening. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. September 2017.
https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/draft-research-plan/hepatitis-b-virus-infection-in-pregnant-women-screening

USPSTF Program Office   5600 Fishers Lane, Mail Stop 06E53A, Rockville, MD 20857