Final Research Plan: Nonpregnant Adolescents and Adults
Final Research Plan for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infection: Screening
Recommendations made by the USPSTF are independent of the U.S. government. They should not be construed as an official position of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
The final Research Plan is used to guide a systematic review of the evidence by researchers at an Evidence-based Practice Center. The resulting Evidence Review will form the basis of the USPSTF Recommendation Statement on this topic.
The draft Research Plan was available for comment from February 23 to March 22, 2017.
* Harms of screening include false-positive results, anxiety and effects of labeling, and partner discord, abuse, or violence.
† Harms of treatment include adverse effects associated with antiretroviral therapy, including cardiometabolic outcomes.
Abbreviations: AIDS=acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; HIV=human immunodeficiency virus; STI=sexually transmitted infection.
Key Questions to Be Systematically Reviewed
- What are the benefits of screening for HIV infection in asymptomatic, nonpregnant adolescents and adults on mortality, AIDS and opportunistic infections, quality of life, function, and reduced transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections?
- What is the yield (number of new diagnoses per tests performed) of screening for HIV infection at different intervals in asymptomatic, nonpregnant adolescents and adults, and how does the screening yield vary in different risk groups?
- What are the harms of screening for HIV infection in asymptomatic, nonpregnant adolescents and adults?
- What are the effects of initiating antiretroviral therapy in adolescents and adults with chronic HIV infection at a higher versus lower CD4 count on mortality, AIDS and opportunistic infections, quality of life, function, and reduced transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections?
- What are the longer-term harms (≥2 years) associated with currently recommended antiretroviral therapy regimens?
The Research Approach identifies the study characteristics and criteria that the Evidence-based Practice Center will use to search for publications and to determine whether identified studies should be included or excluded from the Evidence Review. Criteria are overarching as well as specific to each of the key questions (KQs).
||Studies conducted in low- and middle-income countries, unless fair- or good-quality studies from the United States are not available.|
|Populations*||KQs 1–3: Asymptomatic adolescents and adults age 15 years and older
KQs 4, 5: Adolescents and adults living with HIV
|KQs 1–3: Persons who have known HIV infection, are on dialysis, are posttransplant, have occupational exposure (due to risk of needle stick or other parenteral exposure), or have known infection with hepatitis C virus, hepatitis B virus, or tuberculosis
KQ 4: Persons who have acute HIV infection, are on dialysis, or are posttransplant; studies limiting enrollment to persons with hepatitis C virus, hepatitis B virus, or tuberculosis coinfection
KQ 5: Same as for KQ 4, plus persons who are already or were previously taking antiretroviral therapy
|Interventions||KQs 1–3: Rapid or standard HIV testing
KQs 4, 5: Currently recommended antiretroviral therapy regimens
|Outcomes||KQs 1, 4: Mortality; AIDS and opportunistic infections; quality of life; function; reduced transmission of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections
KQ 2: Number of new diagnoses per number of tests performed
KQ 3: False-positive results, anxiety and effects of labeling, and partner discord, abuse, or violence
KQ 5: Adverse outcomes associated with antiretroviral therapy, including cardiometabolic outcomes
|Comparisons||KQs 1, 3: HIV screening vs. no screening
KQ 2: Repeat HIV screening vs. one-time screening; screening at one interval vs. another
KQ 4: Initiation of antiretroviral therapy at higher vs. lower CD4 counts
|Study designs||KQs 1–3: Randomized, controlled trials and controlled observational studies
KQ 4: Randomized, controlled trials and large controlled observational studies
KQ 5: Randomized, controlled trials and controlled observational studies; will consider treatment series if these study designs are not available
|KQ 1: Uncontrolled observational studies|
|Timing||KQ 5: Long-term followup, defined as ≥2 years|
Response to Public Comment
The draft Research Plan was posted for public comment on the USPSTF Web site from February 23, 2017, to March 22, 2017. In response to comments, the USPSTF revised the analytic framework to differentiate the harms of screening from harms of treatment, clarify the diagnostic staging step, and clarify that the evidence review will focus on the benefits and harms of treatment with antiretroviral therapy. The USPSTF also clarified that the subgroups of interest are those defined by sex, age (adolescents and adults), race/ethnicity, and risk group. For KQ 4, the USPSTF clarified that "earlier versus later" initiation of antiretroviral therapy will be based on CD4 count. The USPSTF also replaced the term "newer antiretroviral therapy regimens" with "currently approved antiretroviral therapy regimens."
Internet Citation: Final Research Plan: Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infection: Screening. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. October 2018.