Skip to navigation bar Skip to breadcrumbs Skip to page content
Browse All Topics Envelope icon E-mail Updates Teal square Text size:  a A A
You are here: HomeAbout the USPSTFTask Force 101 ResourcesUnderstanding How the USPSTF Works

Understanding How the USPSTF Works: USPSTF 101

Slide 1

 

Understanding How the
U.S. Preventive Services
Task Force Works

USPSTF 101

 

Slide 2

 


Goals

  • Improve understanding of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
    (USPSTF or Task Force)
  • Explain the connection between the USPSTF & the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
  • Describe how the Task Force develops recommendations
  • Highlight opportunities for public input
  • Highlight dissemination efforts

 


 

Slide 3

 


Overview


The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force…
  • Makes recommendations on clinical preventive services to primary care clinicians
  • • The USPSTF scope for clinical preventive services includes:
  • screening tests
  • counseling
  • preventive medications
  • • Recommendations address only services offered in the primary care setting or services referred by a primary care clinician.
  • • Recommendations apply to adults & children with no signs or symptoms (or unrecognized signs and symptoms).

 


 

 

Slide 4

 


Overview, cont'd.


The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force…
  • Makes recommendations based on rigorous review of existing peer-reviewed evidence
  • • Does not conduct the research studies, but reviews & assesses the research
  • • Evaluates benefits and harms of each service based on factors such as age & sex
  • Is an independent panel of non-Federal experts in prevention & evidenced-based medicine

 


 

 

Slide 5

 


USPSTF Members

  • The 16 volunteer members represent disciplines of primary care including family medicine, internal medicine, nursing, obstetrics/gynecology, pediatrics, and behavioral medicine.
  • Led by a Chair and Vice Chairs.
  • Serve 4-year terms.
  • Appointed by AHRQ Director with guidance from Chair & Vice Chairs.
  • Complete a rigorous review of potential conflicts of interest.
  • Current members include deans, medical directors, practicing clinicians, and professors:

 


 

 

Slide 6




AHRQ’s Support of the Task Force

  • AHRQ’s Mission: to produce evidence to make health care safer, higher quality, more accessible, equitable, and affordable, and to work within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and with other partners to make sure that the evidence is understood and used.
  • AHRQ provides administrative, scientific, technical, and dissemination support to the USPSTF.
  • AHRQ’s Director, with guidance from the USPSTF Chair & Vice Chairs, appoints USPSTF members.
  • While AHRQ provides support to the USPSTF, it is important to note that the USPSTF is an independent entity.

 


 

 

Slide 7



USPSTF Methods

  • Rigorous 4-stage recommendation development process over 24 months+
    • Topic nomination
    • Draft and final research plans
    • Draft evidence review and recommendation statement
    • Final evidence review and recommendation statements
  • 4-week public comment period on all drafts
  • Consult with subject matter experts
  • Procedure manual available under Methods and Processes at: http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org

 

 

Slide 8

 


Topic Nomination

  • How are topics nominated for review?
  • • Anyone can nominate a topic for the USPSTF to consider via its Web site
    http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/tftopicnom.htm
  • • The public may:
  • • Suggest a new preventive service topic
  • • Recommend reconsideration of an existing topic due to:
  • • Availability of new evidence
  • • Changes in the public health burden of the condition
  • • Availability of new screening tests supported by new evidence
  • • Topic nominations are accepted all year round and are considered by the
    USPSTF at its three annual meetings

 


 

 

Slide 9

 


The USPSTF Recommendations Development Process

Step 1: Topic Nomination

 


 

Slide 10

 


The USPSTF Recommendations Development Process (cont.)

Step 2: Draft and Final Research Plans

 


 

Slide 11

 


The USPSTF Recommendations Development Process (cont.)


Step 3: Draft Evidence Review and Draft Recommendation Statement

 


 

Slide 12

 


The USPSTF Recommendations Development Process (cont.)


Step 4: Final Evidence Review and Final Recommendation Statement

Slide 13

 


Recommendation Grades

Letter grades are assigned to each recommendation statement. These grades are based on the strength of the evidence on the harms and benefits of a specific preventive service. http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/grades.htm
Grade Definition
A The USPSTF recommends the service. There is high certainty that the net benefit is substantial.
B The USPSTF recommends the service. There is high certainty that the net benefit is moderate or there is moderate certainty that the net benefit is moderate to substantial.
C The USPSTF recommends selectively offering or providing this service to individual patients based on professional judgment and patient preferences. There is at least moderate certainty that the net benefit is small.
D The USPSTF recommends against the service. There is moderate or high certainty that the service has no net benefit or that the harms outweigh the benefits.
I Statement The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of the service. Evidence is lacking, of poor quality, or conflicting, and the balance of benefits and harms cannot be determined.

 


 

Slide 14



Dissemination & Implementation (D&I)


 

 

Slide 15

 
Thank You for your interest
www.USPreventiveServicesTaskForce.org

 
Current as of: July 2016

Internet Citation: Understanding How the USPSTF Works: USPSTF 101. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. July 2016.
http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Name/understanding-how-the-uspstf-works

USPSTF Program Office   5600 Fishers Lane, Mail Stop 06E53A, Rockville, MD 20857